Truman, Harry S., 1884-1972; Webb, James E. (James Edwin), 1906-1992; Barkley, Alben William, 1877-1956; Lovett, Robert A. (Robert Abercrombie), 1895-1986; Wilson, Charles Edward, 1886-1972; Tobin, Maurice J., 1901-1953
Cabinet meetings; Anglo-Iranian Oil Dispute, 1951-1954; Korean War, 1950-1953
Cabinet Meeting Minutes, September 21, 1951. Matthew J. Connelly Papers - Notes on Cabinet Meetings II.
CABINET MEETING, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1951
Acheson - Absent
Snyder - Absent
Harriman - Absent
Webb for State
Foley for Treasury
Briefed Cabinet on Korea
NATO meeting at Ottawa was a success. Turkey and Greece are being admitted
to the Western Europe Defense group. This is a real accomplishment. The
other significant development is the desire of European nations to make the
North Atlantic Pact more than a mere military assistance pact.
In Iran the situation is still critical.
Tax bill has been reported out to Senate floor where it will now be
debated. Asked for policy on ratification of Japanese Peace Treaty.
The Treaty will not be sent to Congress this session. It will probably be
sent to Congress in January.
There is no "push button" war in sight. We are experimenting with guided
missiles but we have not had them reach a state of perfection. They may
reach a stage of perfection by 1954 but until then the conventional methods
of waging war will be continued.
It is vital to our own protection to keep Iranian oil out of Russian hands.
If they get this oil they will be able to prolong a war twice as long as
they could without this source of supply.
Told Wilson that he wanted him to crack down on rent gouging of GI's in
Alaska (one room shack with no water facilities renting for $100 a month.)
Military demands for materials for 1st quarter of 1952 have increased
sharply. If we go through with it we will have to curtail even more
civilian production with attendant effect of a dislocation of labor.
Detroit is the hardest hit city on unemployment with present trend we will
have 150,000 unemployed in 1952. We have other serious areas in New
England and the South. Allocation of new defense plants should be reviewed
to put them into areas where we have a labor surplus not in areas where
there is now a labor shortage.