Oral History Interview with
George L. Warren
Long career dealing with problems of refugees and displaced persons starting in 1928, including service during the Truman administration as a member of the U.S. delegation to the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Sessions of the Council of UNRRA, 1944-46; U.S. representative, U.N. special Committee on Refugees and Displaced Persons, 1946; adviser to the U.S. representative, U.N. Economic and Social Council, 1946; U.S. representative, Preparatory Commission, International Refugee Organization, 1947-48; adviser to U.S. delegates, U.N. General Assembly, 1948, 1949, and 1950; and U.S. representative, General Council and Executive Committee, International Refugee Organization, 1948-52
Washington, D.C.
November 10, 1972
by Richard D. McKinzie
[Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | List of Subjects Discussed]
NOTICE
This is a transcript of a tape-recorded interview conducted for the Harry S. Truman Library. A draft of this transcript was edited by the interviewee but only minor emendations were made; therefore, the reader should remember that this is essentially a transcript of the spoken, rather than the written word.
Numbers appearing in square brackets (ex. [45]) within the transcript indicate
the pagination in the original, hardcopy version of the oral history interview.
RESTRICTIONS
This oral history transcript may be read, quoted from, cited, and reproduced for purposes of research. It may not be published in full except by permission of the Harry S. Truman Library.
Opened January, 1976
Harry S. Truman Library
Independence, Missouri
[Top of the Page | Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | List of Subjects Discussed]
Oral History Interview with
George L. Warren
Washington, D.C.
November 10, 1972
by Richard D. McKinzie
[1] MCKINZIE: Mr. Warren, many students of history would be interested to
know how one becomes an expert in the subject of refugees. You had a long
career dealing with refugee problems dating from the First World War.
What motivated you? Is there any particular reason that you became interested
in the problems of refugees and indigent aliens?
WARREN: I think it was a matter of gradual development. When I was in
Harvard from 1906 to 1910, I spent three hours a day the last two years,
1909 and 1910, working with the Associated Charities in Boston dealing
with homeless men -- wanderers. Later when I was in Bridgeport,
[2] Connecticut in 1919 to 1928 -- that was the time of World War I, Bridgeport
was just chaos, it was a war production city. The Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court of Connecticut, Honorable George W. Wheeler was also Chairman
of the Draft Board, and wouldn't let me go to war. I was Chairman of the
Home Service Committee of the American Red Cross. And one of the cases
that came to my attention was a woman whose husband was a GI and was killed
in the war. She was left with only a few hundred dollars, and I had to
take care of her.
Then I had another case. It was an Italian woman with six or eight children
whose husband just got up and left one Friday afternoon and went to Italy
and joined the army -- the U.S. Army. And she was left with six or eight
children.
Well, these two cases got me interested in problems of families that
were created by separation between countries. After I left Warner Brothers
in 1928, I was offered the
[3] position of Director of the International Migration Service, which dealt
with just this kind of problem. It is now called the International Social
Service. And that’s how I got interested in families whose problems
were created by migration -- where the families were separated.
In 1938 when the refugees began to increase, President Roosevelt (prior
to his calling the Evian Conference) organized the President’s Advisory
Committee on Political Refugees. And members of the committee, like Hamilton
Fish Armstrong, James G. McDonald, Paul Baerwald, Basil Harris, Rabbi
Stephen Wise, and Joseph P. Chamberlain all knew me and named me secretary
of that Committee. And that’s how I happened to be asked by Sumner
Welles, Under Secretary of State, to go to Evian to be adviser to Myron
Taylor, who was the U.S. Representative at the Evian Conference, and unfamiliar
with the problem.
[4] MCKINZIE: You weren't completely satisfied with the outcome of the Evian
Conference?
WARREN: No. But there were reasons for that and it wasn't a complete
failure. It was toward the end of the depression. All the Latin-American
countries, which might have been reception countries of resource, were
having trouble by movements from the rural areas into cities -- and serious
unemployment. Our own Congress was very hostile to the idea of admitting
any refugees. We tried to get the United Kingdom to provide some place
of resettlement on the land. Everybody at that time thought that the only
thing to do was to colonize them in agriculture.
MCKINZIE: Did you also believe that, at that time?
WARREN: I did at the time, but I realized later that it was completely
impractical. President Roosevelt himself, was very much interested in
such colonization. And incidentally, in 1939 he
[5] predicted remarkably closely the problem of the refugees and displaced
persons at the end of the war -- it's amazing. He was constantly working
with the president of John Hopkins University at that time, Isaiah Bowman.
Roosevelt during that period had Isaiah Bowman exploring every uninhabited
land where these people might be placed. And Bowman had more reality about
problems of settlement than Roosevelt had. He [Bowman] knew every square
foot in Latin America. He finally came up with the only solution -- that
you had to introduce these refugees and displaced persons to existing
rural areas and set them up in suburban areas to existing urban areas.
But nothing ever came of that. We tried it out in a special mission that
we sent to British Guiana, which the British very reluctantly agreed to.
It was a joint British-U.S. mission under the auspices of this President's
Advisory Committee.
Well, they got down there to Georgetown and there was an American flyer
with a seaplane
[6] and he flew them over the rain forest, up to the plateau behind all the
Guianas -- very fertile lands. There were refugees from our Civil War
populating this area married to the Indians. The problem was, how would
you get the refugees over the rain forest, because it was a hundred miles
deep. You could bring them up through Brazil -- approach it that way or
you could fly them in. Well, war broke out in 1939 and that was the end
of that. And that was the end of any further efforts of colonization.
From then on it was entirely an individual movement.
MCKINZIE: There was, after the war, some considerable guilt feeling,
don't you think, on the part of some people in the administration for
their failure to take in Jewish refugees from Hitler's Germany?
WARREN: I don't think so. I think Roosevelt's hands were completely tied
by an overwhelming unwillingness in the Congress to admit refugees based
[7] partly on fear that the refugees would be fifth columnists. I don’t
think that fear was real, but there was no question about the attitude
of Congress. Roosevelt's hands were tied. He did all he could in the situation.
Later, he just arbitrarily brought a thousand refugees from Italy and
put them up in a camp in New York State, Oswego. And was terribly criticized
in Congress for doing that, but that is proof of his concern. Actually,
he called the Evian Conference in July '38, because he felt he had to
do something to react to the Anschluss in Austria. He didn't know what
else to do. He was terribly embarrassed because, having called the conference,
he couldn't do anything about taking refugees into the United States himself.
And all he could do was to exhaust the quotas, which they did. But he
did that with Congress growling at him every day of the week.
MCKINZIE: Then there was little that your own organization could do to
change the situation?
[8] WARREN: Only for these intellectuals, that's all we could do. And otherwise
we tried to work through the Intergovernmental Committee on Refugees,
which resulted from the Evian Conference. That was a futile effort by
George Rublee to get some kind of a financial deal with the Nazis to let
the refugees out with some of their own property. That failed completely.
And when that happened Rublee resigned and it just got down to a refugee
placement job. The Intergovernmental Committee -- which only had financial
support from the U.S. and the U.K., all the other members simply paid
their dues -- was the first organization that actually put up some money
to buy a boat to move some refugees without charge out of Germany. That
was their big contribution. They put up the first money to support refugees
in the occupied countries, and they put up the first boat that started
moving refugees out of Europe. Nobody has ever given them credit for that.
[9] Later, as the Congress became more involved, and that brings me to this
report. [See “The Development of United States Participation in
Intergovernmental Efforts to Resolve Refugee Problems,” in George
L. Warren Papers, Harry S. Truman Library.] In UNRRA and IRO the U.S.
was paying 70 to 75 and 80 percent of the cost. We were paying for the
support of the refugees in Germany. We were feeding them through our subsidization
to the German economy. That's where Congressman [Francis E.] Walter comes
in. He was just as opposed to having refugees enter the United States
as every other Congressman, and that's why he was interested in creating
IRO, International Refugee Organization, in an effort to divert the pressure
on the United States to get refugees off to other countries. It wasn't
all so glorious as this report.
MCKINZIE: Once the war was underway -- once the United States got into
the war, the War Refugee Board began to consider those kinds of problems.
What was your relationship with that, and can you assess their work?
[10] WARREN: I was the liaison officer in the State Department to the War Refugee
Board. All their messages came to me, and I had to get the messages cleared
through the Department, because otherwise they wouldn't go out. I thought
they were very aggressive. They certainly took advantage of every opportunity
that was available. They saved a lot of people -- I can't put figures
on it, although they produced a report somewhere.
They produced a report and it was factual. They had no regard for the
State Department's problems with other governments. I remember one telegram,
particularly, that in my judgment was so insulting to the Swiss Government,
which I felt was doing all that it could under a situation of neutrality,
that I myself didn't want to send it. I went to John Pehle, he and I got
along very well together. He told me that [Henry, Jr.] Morgenthau had
said that Secretary [Cordell] Hull had agreed to send this cable. I couldn't
believe
[11] that. And I went to the Secretary and I said, "Did you tell Morgenthau
that I could send this out?" He read it and he was shocked. So I
went over to Morgenthau and I said, "I'm afraid there's been some
misunderstanding because I can't get Mr. Hull to agree to this."
Morgenthau tore me to pieces. I went back to Hull. It was so late then
I got him at home at night. He told me to round up everybody in the Department
who had anything to do with this particular cable at quarter of nine in
his office the next morning. And I spent the whole night rounding them
up; and they were all there. Hull walked in and said, "Sorry gentlemen,
I've got to go somewhere else." And then he said to me, "See
[Green H.] Hackworth."
I got hold of Hackworth. And Hackworth and I walked the corridors of
the old State Department Building for two solid hours discussing this
cable. And finally Hackworth said, "George, send it." The Swiss
Government
[12] was in Washington the next day. They even went down and protested to Morgenthau.
And the next day Hull called me back and he said, "George, I don't
think I was very helpful to you, and I hereby give you authority to pass
any cable, provided you're convinced it won't start a war between us and
the recipient." That was the kind of thing that went on. In the end,
[Edward R., Jr.] Stettinius and Pehle exchanged letters and Hull said
everything had gone well. But it was a terrific experience!
MCKINZIE: Do you think that the War Refugee Board anticipated the nature
of the postwar refugee problems -- or did anybody?
WARREN: No. No. They were more interested in immediate rescue. No. Actually
they went out of business in the late summer of '45, before we even got
around to facing the postwar refugee problems.
[13] MCKINZIE: Were you aware, or was anybody aware that you knew of, that
there were going to be problems of the Volksdeutsche that were going to
be political refugees from Eastern Europe? Had that been anticipated during
the war?
WARREN: No, only by Roosevelt. Roosevelt is the one man who predicted
that, and nobody believed him at the time, and he did that in '39.
MCKINZIE: Then you went from this liaison position to working with UNRRA
when UNRRA was established.
WARREN: I was only with UNRRA about a month and that was before Charlie
[Charles P.] Taft brought me in to the State Department to act as liaison
officer with the War Refugee Board. I had no experience with the State
Department at all. I didn't know how their trains ran and was suddenly
thrown into this situation.
MCKINZIE: Could you talk about your experience with UNRRA?
[14] WARREN: My only experience with UNRRA: I was Chairman of the Committee
on Displaced Persons in the UNRRA governing organization. As a representative
of the U.S. I was Chairman of that Committee. Then when UNRRA was actually
in existence immediately after Atlantic City where it was set up, I was
on the UNRRA staff for about a month. I disagreed with Governor [Herbert
H.] Lehman who insisted that this problem of refugees had to be handled
through the country organizations that UNRRA now was setting up. I said,
"Governor this is an unusual problem that supersedes any country
interest. You've got to handle it with a separate organization, directly
responsible to you." He rejected that. And I think only the next
day Charlie Taft called me up and said, "Won't you come over and
provide liaison with the War Refugee Board?"
MCKINZIE: Did you have the feeling that you were alone in arguing this
to Governor Lehman, or were there
[15] some other people arguing?
WARREN: I was completely alone. Nobody else was interested or knowledgeable.
MCKINZIE: Did you have the feeling that UNRRA people didn't think that
refugees would be a large problem at the end of the war.
WARREN: I had a feeling that Governor Lehman had a staff assistant, Hugh
Jackson. He was a younger man, who had no knowledge or understanding of
the problem. And Governor Lehman was following his line. He was a good
administrative officer, but he had no special knowledge of this problem.
You see, prior to this time, while I was consultant in the State Department
on a day to day basis, Professor Joseph Chamberlain of Columbia University
and I had a committee in the State Department -- representative of the
Navy, John D. Rockefeller III, Wall Cohen, downtown, and so on. While
the firing was still going on we were compiling estimates of the persons
who were
[16] displaced by the war. Some thirty million in Europe, and we never knew
what the figures were in the Far East. I remember Ike [Dwight D. Eisenhower]
came home one time for the weekend. He came home on Thursday night, and
he said, "I want the analysis that you folks make of what the displaced
problem will be when the shooting stops." I spent an entire night
down at the Government Printing Office getting these statistics together
and we handed Ike the report. It was on that report that the military
based their whole treatment of refugees and displaced persons as soon
as the shooting stopped.
MCKINZIE: And then it was -- wasn’t it just about as soon as the
shooting stopped that President Truman appointed Earl Harrison?
WARREN: On one trip.
MCKINZIE: To make a trip to assess the nature of the refugee problem?
[17]
WARREN: Oh, no, no, no. Earl Harrison was sent by Truman on the instigation
of the War Refugee Board. The War Refugee Board had become convinced that
the treatment of the refugees and displaced persons in camps was pretty
awful. And it was awful. John Pehle complained to Truman and Truman
sent Harrison to check that fact. And Harrison came back and said, "Yes,
the conditions in the camps are terrible." I think he might have
added, "I don't think Ike is aware of what he's got to deal with.
He's preoccupied with other problems." And that's when Truman sent
Ike a pretty stiff cable and said, "Get on the job and do something
about these refugees and camps." I think Ike got furious.
MCKINZIE: President Truman by December of 1945 was trying to help a little
bit by bringing some
[18] refugees into the United States.
WARREN: Yes.
MCKINZIE: Using quotas that had not been filled during the war.
WARREN: That's another story and I was on the side of that. And I have
a paper that will summarize all those actions.
MCKINZIE: You were aware then that you were a part of the great dialogue
that was going on then -- from May to December of 1945, between the defeat
of Germany and the attempt of President Truman to open up the immigration
quotas a little bit, to use some of the unfilled immigration quotas. In
short, how did you get your message to him?
WARREN: Well, I don't know. You see, the only, personal, contact I ever
had with Truman was on the occasion of those pictures. Thereafter, I dealt
with persons who were appointed by Truman. For instance, Truman nominated
Arthur
[19] Altmeyer. I worked very closely with him. He was succeeded by [William]
Hallam Tuck, who was a great [Herbert] Hoover man. He was suggested by
Jerry Vorhees who had helped us to get the IRO money through. I think
he came from California. But Tuck didn't work out too well. He was not
a good administrator, but he was very popular with European governments.
Quite unexpectedly, we got an inquiry from the White House about Tuck.
How was he doing? Well, I sent word very frankly that he wasn't doing
too well. Whereupon the White House nominated J. Donald Kingsley, and
I had to secure Tuck's departure and get Kingsley appointed. It was a
nasty piece of business.
MCKINZIE: I have a newspaper clipping here from the New York Times
[see clipping in OF 85-Q, New York Times, July 7, 1949] dealing
with the appointment of...
WARREN: Mike [Michael, L.] Hoffman.
[20] MCKINZIE: ...of Kingsley. That's right, that's the reporter's name, yes.
WARREN: Yes, I know. That was one of the toughest problems I ever faced,
single-handedly. Tuck resigned, but he didn't advise us that he was going
to, or that he had resigned. That was a little discourtesy on his part,
and this combined with my report to the White House that he wasn't doing
very well anyway. I had instructions from Truman to get Kingsley appointed.
I sat out a whole week standing all alone against all the other members
of the IRO Council. I finally went to Tuck and I said, "Look, if
you're wise enough to withdraw your resignation, I'm helpless, because
if your resignation doesn't exist, I haven't the authority to replace
you." And he wouldn't do that. I said, "All right. Then I sit
here until you withdraw."
And finally I said to the other governments, "Look, I will send
any message to the Department
[21]
that you want to send in your effort to overrule my position. And I
will refrain even from calling the Department. You draft the cable. I'll
send it, and we'll see. It so happened that Herb Fierst and General [John]
Hilldring got the cable, and their feeling was Truman has told Warren
to get Kingsley elected. So they sent me back a cable completely supporting
my position, which was a godsend. Well, then the other governments
broke down and elected Kingsley overnight. And then Mike Hoffman came
on and wrote this. Mike Hoffman knew Kingsley and thought very well of
him. But Mike thought that I was throwing the U.S. weight around. We were!
But it was in a good cause because actually IRO was a mess at that time.
MCKINZIE: A mess in the sense that it was inefficient?
WARREN: Inefficient, yes. At this particular meeting, I got three financial
reports from the administration -- all different. And Tuck didn't know
[22] what was going on.
MCKINZIE: But he was still very popular, evidently. All the other representatives
supported him.
WARREN: Oh, all the other governments were for him. Yes, they were for
him.
MCKINZIE: Could we go back just a little bit to 1945 and ‘46 and
the perception of the refugee problem by people in the State Department,
people such as Secretary [James F.] Byrnes and...
WARREN: Oh, that's the strangest part of this whole history -- you mentioned
Secretary Byrnes. In 1946 I had been to London on two preparatory committees
drafting and planning the finances of IRO. And we brought back a draft
constitution and a budget to the U.N. Economic and Social Council in September
'46. [John Gilbert] Winant was the U.S. representative, and I had met
him at the Evian Conference. He had the flu and he was in bed. I came
home from the meeting one afternoon
[23] and I said, "Governor, we're going to lose. Sir Philip Noel-Baker,
representative of the British Government, is persuading the Latin-American
countries that they are being asked to participate in a budget for this
organization that in some instances is larger than the budgets of their
own governments for a year." Sir Philip Noel-Baker who was a very
prominent member of the Labor Party, I don't think he was actually in
the government at the moment, but he was the representative here. And
I said, "If he has another day this project is dead."
And Winant said, "Well what do you want me to do?"
I said, "I want you to get Sir Philip Noel-Baker out of New York
tonight." Without another word he picked up the phone and
got Clement Attlee -- so quickly I was surprised. And he said, "Clem,
you know that when I left London you wanted to give me a great to-do,
and I wouldn't take any of it." And he said, "Now, I have a
raincheck."
[24] And Clem said, "Gil, I don't know what you're going to ask me to
do, but it's done."
Gil said, "Fine, I want you to withdraw Philip Noel-Baker from New
York tonight and send over in his place Sir Hector McNeil."
McNeil was there the next morning and Baker was gone. McNeil was interested
in giving relief to refugees -- moving them. Baker in his younger
days had been an associate or assistant to Fridjof Nansen. His idea of
the whole problem was to give everybody an identity paper. He was acting
on his own, because Hector McNeil and Sir George Rendall, they'd already
approved all of these budgets. It was all planned. But Baker thought he
outranked them I guess and tried to act on his own. That's what I left
out of the report because he was still alive. Now he's dead and I can
tell it. But that's what saved IRO.
Later, Mrs. Roosevelt and I got the thing through the Economic and Social
Council, but I had
[25] to cut a hundred million out of the budget to do it -- overnight. The
Committee in London received some terribly misleading information about
the cost of taking care of the refugees. I think the budget that we brought
to New York was two hundred and fifty million. Winant and I cut a hundred
million out of the budget overnight. And we finally got that through.
MCKINZIE: At whose order was this cut? Who ordered the cut to the hundred
million dollars?
WARREN: Winant and I did it. We had no orders from anybody. But I knew
if we had left it in, we'd be licked. We didn’t have to consult
anyone in the State Department. We were just being realists. Well, later,
we went through the same performance in the General Assembly.
Mrs. Roosevelt was the U.S. representative in Committee 3. The Russians
put in seventy-five amendments to the constitution. Mrs. Roosevelt
[26] and I fought those amendments and we won most of them by 14 to 13, and
16 to 15, and 12 to 9. Finally Mrs. Roosevelt said to me, she said, "Mr.
Warren, are you sure we're on the right track?"
I said, "I think I am, but..."
She said, "Well, what authority have you to do this?"
I said, "I haven't any. The only backing I've got is Senator Vandenberg."
He came in one day and listened to this and sat behind my chair, and after
listening to two or three votes he patted me on the shoulder and he said,
"Stick it out. Get that through."
Well, it was after that Mrs. Roosevelt began to get query. She had the
right to. And she said, "I don't know, I'm getting worried about
this. You say you have no authority from the State Department, you had
no instructions?"
I said, "No, I haven't. Well, look, you're going to lunch with Secretary
Byrnes tomorrow.
[27] Why don't you ask him? He's the top man in the State Department."
I met her after lunch and she said, "I asked him four times, and
I couldn't get an answer out of him."
"Well," I said, "then under those circumstances, let's
keep going," which we did. Incidently, General Hilldring and Herb
Fierst came up just like Vandenberg and listened to me, and didn't say
a word. I didn't know they were there. Finally, when I wrote this report,
I figured out what the difficulty was. In another committee in the U.N.
Assembly -- Dean Acheson and Mr. Byrnes were desperately fighting against
Mayor La Guardia's efforts to extend UNRRA. The reason that they were
opposed to it was that the Soviet Government had so exploited UNRRA that
they just couldn't take any more of it. So, the U.S. position in the General
Assembly of the U.N. was terribly ambivalent. Here Acheson and Byrnes
were fighting against any more UNRRA, and Mrs. Roosevelt and I were fighting
in another committee
[28] for a hundred and fifty million dollar budget for IRO. I didn't know that
at the time. I finally figured it out when I wrote this report. But I
don't think that's in the report.
[Top of the Page | Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | List of Subjects Discussed]
List of Subjects Discussed
Acheson, Dean, 27
American Red Cross, 2
Associated Charities (Boston), 1
Attlee, Clement, 23, 24
Austria, 7
Bowman, Isaiah, 5
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 1-2
British Guiana, 5-6
Byrnes, James F., 22, 26, 27
Camp Oswego, New York, 7
Chamberlain, Joseph, 15
Committee on Displaced Persons, UNRRA, 14
Congress, U.S., anti-refugee sentiment in, 4, 6-7
Displaced Persons Camps, conditions in, 17
Eastern Europe, refugees from, 13
Eisenhower, Dwight D., 16, 17
Evian Conference, 3-4, 7, 8
Germany (Nazi), 8, 9
Hackworth, Green H., 11
Harrison, Earl, 16, 17
Hoffman, Michael, 19, 20, 21
Hull, Cordell, 10-12
Immigration quotas, U.S., 18
Intergovernmental Committee on Refugees, 8
International Migration Service, 3
International Refugee organization, 9, 20-28
Jackson, Hugh, 15
Jewish refugees, 6, 7, 8
Kingsley, J. Donald, 19-21
Latin America, proposed as a refugee colonization site, 4-5
Lehman, Herbert H., 14, 15
McNeil, Sir Hector, 24
Morgenthau, Henry, Jr., 10-12
Noel-Baker, Sir Philip, 23, 24
Pehle, John, 10, 12, 17
President's Advisory Committee on Political Refugees, 3,
5
Refugees, colonization plans for, 4-6
Roosevelt, Eleanor, 24-27
Roosevelt, Franklin D., 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 13
Rublee, George, 8
Stettinius, Edward R., 12
Switzerland, 10-12
Taft, Charles P., 13, 14
Taylor, Myron C., 3
Truman, Harry S., 16, 17, 18,
20, 21
Tuck, William H., 19-22
United Kingdom, 4, 8
United Nations Economic and Social Council, 22-25
United Nations General Assembly, 25-28
UNRRA, 9, 13-15, 27
Vandenberg, Arthur H., 26
Voorhis, Jerry, 19
Walter, Francis E., 9
War Refugee Board, 9-14, 17
Welles, Sumner, 3
Wheeler, George W., 2
Winant, John G., 22-25
[Top of the Page | Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | List of Subjects Discussed]
|